Mobile Devices in the Enterprise: The iOS vs. Android Debate

In the realm of enterprise mobile devices, the debate between iOS and Android has been ongoing for over a decade. Both platforms have evolved significantly since their inception, with iOS making its debut in 2007 and Android gaining traction around 2011. This article delves into this debate, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each platform in the enterprise context.

A Historical Perspective

When Steve Jobs first introduced the iPhone in 2007, it revolutionized the mobile industry. Initially, developers could only create HTML5 apps for the iPhone, but Apple soon released Xcode, allowing for native app development.

Android, on the other hand, offered a more open platform, with manufacturers having the freedom to customize and create their own devices. This led to a plethora of Android devices, each with its unique features and capabilities

Hardware and Device Landscape

One of the most significant differences between the two platforms is the hardware landscape. Apple offers a consistent experience across its devices since it’s the sole manufacturer of Apple products.

This ensures that whether you’re a global corporation or an individual consumer, the device you purchase will offer the same user experience.

Android, conversely, offers a vast array of devices from various manufacturers. Companies like Samsung, Honeywell, and Zebra have taken the Android OS and tailored it to fit specific market needs.

This diversity means that users have a broader range of choices, but it can also lead to inconsistencies in user experience.

Android is renowned for its open-source nature. This means that its source code is freely available, allowing manufacturers and developers to customize and modify the software to their liking.

iOS vs Android in the Enterprise

  1. Openness and Customization:

    Android: Android is renowned for its open-source nature. This means that its source code is freely available, allowing manufacturers and developers to customize and modify the software to their liking.

    This has led to a plethora of Android devices, each with its unique features and customizations. Companies can even create their own versions of Android tailored to their specific needs. This flexibility is a double-edged sword; while it allows for innovation and differentiation, it can also lead to fragmentation and inconsistency across devices.

    iOS: Apple’s iOS is a closed system. Apple maintains strict control over the software and hardware, ensuring a consistent user experience across all its devices.

    This means that the iOS experience is uniform whether you’re using an iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch. While this limits customization, it ensures stability, security, and a predictable user experience.

  2. Hardware Integration:

    Android: Given its open nature, Android runs on a wide variety of devices made by different manufacturers. This means that the integration between software and hardware can vary significantly from one device to another.

    While some high-end Android devices offer seamless integration, others might not be as optimized.

    iOS: Apple’s control over both the hardware and software of its devices ensures tight integration. This results in optimized performance, battery life, and overall user experience.

    Every aspect of the device, from the processor to the camera, is designed to work in harmony with iOS.

  3. Security and Privacy:

    Android: The open nature of Android can sometimes make it more susceptible to security threats. However, Google has been proactive in addressing these concerns by regularly releasing security patches and updates.

    Additionally, the diversity of Android devices means that security can vary depending on the manufacturer and model.

    iOS: Apple places a high emphasis on user privacy and security. iOS devices come with a range of security features, including end-to-end encryption, Face ID, and Touch ID.

    The closed ecosystem also means that all apps undergo a rigorous review process before being allowed on the App Store, reducing the risk of malicious software.

  4. Developer Experience:

    Android: Developers have a lot of freedom when developing for Android. They can access and modify the operating system’s deeper layers, allowing for more intricate and customized applications.

    However, the fragmentation of Android devices can pose challenges, as developers need to ensure their apps work seamlessly across different devices and versions.

    iOS: Developing for iOS can be more restrictive due to Apple’s guidelines. However, this also means that developers have a more predictable platform to work on.

    The tools provided by Apple, such as Swift and SwiftUI, offer a more unified development experience.

  5. Ecosystem and Integration:

    Android: Android devices can integrate with a variety of other devices and platforms. However, the experience might not always be as seamless as with iOS, given the diversity of Android devices and manufacturers.

    iOS: Apple’s ecosystem is one of its strongest selling points. Devices like the iPhone, iPad, MacBook, Apple Watch, and Apple TV work together seamlessly, offering features like Handoff, Continuity, and Universal Clipboard. This integration enhances productivity and provides a unified user experience.


In summary, the choice between iOS and Android in the enterprise largely depends on the specific needs and preferences of the organization.

While iOS offers consistency, security, and a unified ecosystem, Android provides flexibility, customization, and a broader range of devices. Both have their strengths and challenges, and the decision should be based on a careful evaluation of the organization’s requirements.

Learn more here in our upcoming webinar